Matthew Christopher Romios vs Erik Holt-Crossman Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Christopher Romios vs E. Holt-Crossman

Matthew Christopher Romios

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

889

C. Rank

Ret.

563

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Erik Holt-Crossman

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

889

C. Rank

Ret.

563

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Head-To-Head: Romios 1 - 0 Holt-Crossman

They have played 2 sets in total, with Matthew Christopher Romios winning 2 and Erik Holt-Crossman winning 0. The last match between Matthew Christopher Romios and Erik Holt-Crossman was at the M25 Geelong, 12-03-2020, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(2) 7-6(1).

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Romios	1
Holt-Crossman	0

Last H2H Matches:

(R2) M25 Geelong(03-12-20)

Stats

Matthew Christopher Romios

Erik Holt-Crossman

M. C. Romios vs E. Holt-Crossman H2H Profile

M. C. Romios	Stats	E. Holt-Crossman
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
43.75% (91-117)	Career Total W/L	52.86% (37-33)
1	Grass	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. C. Romios vs E. Holt-Crossman Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Matthew Christopher Romios has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Erik Holt-Crossman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Matthew Christopher Romios, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Erik Holt-Crossman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Matthew Christopher Romios has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Erik Holt-Crossman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Matthew Christopher Romios has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Erik Holt-Crossman winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Matthew Christopher Romios has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 9/ 6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 52/ 76). Erik Holt-Crossman has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 68% (W/L 13/ 6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 39% (W/L 9/ 14).
Player level: In the last year, Matthew Christopher Romios has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as Erik Holt-Crossman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Matthew Christopher Romios winning 1 times and Erik Holt-Crossman being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Matthew Christopher Romios winning 2 and Erik Holt-Crossman winning 0. The last match between Matthew Christopher Romios and Erik Holt-Crossman was at the M25 Geelong, 12-03-2020, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(2) 7-6(1).
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:19:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Matthew Christopher Romios has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Erik Holt-Crossman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Matthew Christopher Romios has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Erik Holt-Crossman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Matthew Christopher Romios has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Erik Holt-Crossman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Matthew Christopher Romios vs Erik Holt-Crossman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. C. Romios vs E. Holt-Crossman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. C. Romios	Stats	E. Holt-Crossman
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
14	Games Won	12
3	Aces (Total)	6
4	Total Double Faults	5
2:19:0	Avg. Match Time	2:19:0
66% (58/88)	1st Serve %	60% (58/96)
71% (41/58)	1st Serve Win %	62% (36/58)
53% (16/30)	2nd Serve Win %	50% (19/38)
33% (3/9)	Break Pts Won %	38% (3/8)
43% (41/96)	Return Pts Won %	35% (31/88)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won → Match Won	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. C. Romios Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Guangzhou Challenger - 09-09-2024
Q1 Rishab AgarwalR. Agarwal	L	6-3 2-0 ret.	Stats
Modena Challenger - 01-07-2024
Q1 Jose StathamJ. Statham	L	7-6(7) 4-6 6-3	Stats
Taipei Challenger - 13-05-2024
Q1 Yusuke TakahashiY. Takahashi	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Cuernavaca Challenger - 08-04-2024
Q3 Facundo MenaF. Mena	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
Q1 Ezekiel ClarkE. Clark	W	6-3 3-6 6-3	Stats

View All

E. Holt-Crossman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
M25 Geelong - 09-03-2020
R2 Matthew Christopher RomiosM. Christopher	L	7-6(2) 7-6(1)	Stats
R1 Kento TakeuchiK. Takeuchi	W	7-5 6-3	Stats
Q3 Ashwin Ryan SharmaA. Ryan	W	3-6 7-5 10-2	Stats
Q2 Thomas Pavlekovich SmithT. Pavlekovich	W	6-4 5-7 10-8	Stats
Q1 Matthew DellavedovaM. Dellavedova	W	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

M. C. Romios vs E. Holt-Crossman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. C. Romios	Stats	E. Holt-Crossman
43.75% (91/117)	YTD Win/Loss	52.86% (37/33)
45.68% (217/258)	Sets Win/Loss	52.80% (85/76)
47.80% (2068/2258)	Games Win/Loss	51.30% (811/770)
40.63% (52/76)	Hard Win/Loss	39.13% (9/14)
46.15% (30/35)	Clay Win/Loss	53.57% (15/13)
60.00% (9/6)	Grass Win/Loss	68.42% (13/6)
0.35	Aces Per Game	0.09
735	Aces Total	68
0.22	Double Faults Per Game	0.06
461	Total Double Faults	49
1:18:15	Average Match Time	1st Match
502.57	Average Opponent Rank	231.09
59% (6675/11367)	1st Serve %	61% (753/1227)
68% (4530/6675)	1st Serve Win %	64% (482/753)
47% (2221/4692)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (232/474)
43% (394/920)	Break Points Won % (Total)	30% (29/96)
37% (4109/11139)	Return Points Win %	35% (407/1155)
0.00% (0/2)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
34.04% (16/31)	Challenger W/L	50.00% (2/2)
47.17% (75/84)	Futures W/L	53.03% (35/31)
44% (88/200)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	53% (37/70)
50% (2/4)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
58% (31/53)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	50% (10/20)
42% (25/59)	Deciding Set Win %	48% (10/21)
80% (98/78)	1st Set Won, Won Match	79% (39/31)
20% (98/20)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	21% (39/8)
12% (110/13)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (31/6)